| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
| X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| Message-ID: | <4F502104.4050408@cs.cmu.edu> |
| Date: | Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:23:16 -0800 |
| From: | Paul Allen Newell <pnewell AT cs DOT cmu DOT edu> |
| User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/3.1.19 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| CC: | "Newell, Paul" <pnewell AT cs DOT cmu DOT edu> |
| Subject: | Re: question on Cygwin's version of make |
| References: | <4F4F21AC DOT 7060209 AT cs DOT cmu DOT edu> <CAB8Xom9zz5CN+yE6cHBj-h-PG4aUxghckkmAYZiQko8SfmNuhQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAEhDDbCA2YSUfyqNZaTfxgg_f43YgeuPZOS=Z6cyvMVeP5cDkQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAB8Xom-x_um2yRi46r-enu=iJZUe-N2HR_tvf-25VFXBFHOsqQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
| In-Reply-To: | <CAB8Xom-x_um2yRi46r-enu=iJZUe-N2HR_tvf-25VFXBFHOsqQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 2/29/2012 11:55 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Csaba Raduly wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:23 AM, marco atzeri wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
>> (snip)
>>>> I also noticed that if I run "make>& make.out" that the message is printed
>>>> to the terminal and is not in make.out. What am I missing to capture all
>>>> output in make.out?
>>> I like this way
>>>
>>> make&2>1 |tee make.out
>>>
>>> "&2>1" redirect the error message to the std output
>> Shouldn't that be
>>
>> make 2>&1 | tee make.out
> yes correct,
> typo from my side
>
> Paul,
> looks on
> http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Bash-Prog-Intro-HOWTO-3.html
> http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/advanced_bash_scripting_guide/io-redirection.html
>
> for further info.
>
>> Csaba
>> --
> Marco
Marco and Csaba:
I looked in the first suggested link and found what my problem is. Item
#3.6 is
+++
This will place every output of a program to a file. This is suitable
sometimes for cron entries, if you want a command to pass in absolute
silence.
rm -f $(find / -name core) &> /dev/null
+++
This is what I am doing and my problem is basename is sending its
error/warning to the screen and ignoring my "&>". Yes, I know my email
originally stated ">&", but it doesn't seem to matter what the order is
for basename to ignore it.
What am I not understanding in what the link says versus the actions I
am seeing?
Paul
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |