X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Received-SPF:	pass (google.com: domain of yselkowitz AT gmail DOT com designates 10.50.179.7 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.50.179.7;
Authentication-Results:	mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of yselkowitz AT gmail DOT com designates 10.50.179.7 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=yselkowitz AT gmail DOT com; dkim=pass header.i=yselkowitz AT gmail DOT com
Message-ID:	<1330650919.6952.8.camel@YAAKOV04>
Subject:	Re: Recent upgrade to wish leads to a problem
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:15:19 -0600
In-Reply-To:	<87pqcwoy16.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
References:	<70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C3129F4CE5 AT xmb-sjc-233 DOT amer DOT cisco DOT com> <20120301181416 DOT GB28713 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CA+sc5mnk9mkDUJb-4Kz2pRs8Vi-2iH7AD1pqqfOUg_nyojEzZg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20120301182805 DOT GD28713 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CA+sc5mn-1N+uYnB2ZH7BqDxHgGz3jC7xX7vf=9OQDGpLtCy=nw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <87pqcwoy16 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 21:40 +0100, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Earnie Boyd <earnie AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> writes:
> > And what Windows user who casually installs Cygwin has access to an X
> > server?
> 
> I do and FTR: I don't want the cygwin Xorg server to be a dependency to
> all programs that might use X because that would pull in a lot of
> packages that I have no use for on most systems.  You might "recommend"
> companion packages that are typically needed to be combined with a
> specific selected package when installed in an isolated environment, but
> please not a dependency.  It is perfectly OK to install X applications
> onto a machine that doesn't have X installed.  You don't need a server
> there, nor do you need an xinit start script or anything else besides
> the actual application and a handful of DLL.

Thank you for reinforcing my point.  While we certainly promote the
Cygwin/X server, forcing xorg-server/xinit as a dependency not only
won't prevent questions (since the user still needs to *start* the X
server), but those who use other X servers will have this very
complaint.

Now please excuse me while I get back to orchestrating the next major
transition for the distro.


Yaakov



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -