| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
| X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| X-Mail-Handler: | MailHop Outbound by DynDNS |
| X-Report-Abuse-To: | abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) |
| X-MHO-User: | U2FsdGVkX19GA7edIfkRtrStcTmea3im |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:15:04 -0500 |
| From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com> |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: Recent upgrade to wish leads to a problem |
| Message-ID: | <20120301011504.GA19191@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
| Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| References: | <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C3129F4A01 AT xmb-sjc-233 DOT amer DOT cisco DOT com> <1330563447 DOT 7632 DOT 19 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: | <1330563447.7632.19.camel@YAAKOV04> |
| User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 06:57:27PM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 13:43 -0800, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote: >> Would it help to add "xinit" to the requirements for tcl-tk and other >> packages that now require an X11 server? >> >> I know that there are some use cases where "xinit" isn't actually >> required. But would the benefit (fewer problem reports from new users) >> be worth the cost (installing "xinit" for some users who don't actually >> require it)? > >Asking the same question in a dozen different ways won't change the >answer. > >Using X requires user intervention to start an X server first. No >amount of automatic dependencies will change this, and therefore I don't >expect that the number of questions would change one iota. I agree 100% but this now qualifies as a FAQ so maybe we should add an entry about tcl/tk. In the meantime, if people are piling on to suggest this because they think it will cause someone to add xinit as a dependency to something please be assured that this will not happen. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |