delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2012/02/29/20:15:32

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19GA7edIfkRtrStcTmea3im
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:15:04 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Recent upgrade to wish leads to a problem
Message-ID: <20120301011504.GA19191@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C3129F4A01 AT xmb-sjc-233 DOT amer DOT cisco DOT com> <1330563447 DOT 7632 DOT 19 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1330563447.7632.19.camel@YAAKOV04>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 06:57:27PM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 13:43 -0800, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote:
>> Would it help to add "xinit" to the requirements for tcl-tk and other
>> packages that now require an X11 server?
>> 
>> I know that there are some use cases where "xinit" isn't actually
>> required.  But would the benefit (fewer problem reports from new users)
>> be worth the cost (installing "xinit" for some users who don't actually
>> require it)?
>
>Asking the same question in a dozen different ways won't change the
>answer.
>
>Using X requires user intervention to start an X server first.  No
>amount of automatic dependencies will change this, and therefore I don't
>expect that the number of questions would change one iota.

I agree 100% but this now qualifies as a FAQ so maybe we should add an
entry about tcl/tk.

In the meantime, if people are piling on to suggest this because they
think it will cause someone to add xinit as a dependency to something
please be assured that this will not happen.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019