X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4F4A72F0.7050300@acm.org>
Date:	Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:59:12 -0800
From:	David Rothenberger <daveroth AT acm DOT org>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Change in flock(2), testers welcome
References:	<20120226125735 DOT GM7755 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20120226125735.GM7755@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 2/26/2012 4:57 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Anyway, I was mostly interested to find a solution for this typical
> usage of flock(1) for now.  For those interested in this stuff, please
> give it a try.  You'll find it in the latest snapshot I just uploaded to
> http://cygwin.com/snapshots/

The APR test suite passes with the snapshot, for what it's worth.

-- 
David Rothenberger  ----  daveroth AT acm DOT org

"Flattery is all right -- if you don't inhale."
                -- Adlai Stevenson

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -