X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-id:	<4F4814F0.3090006@cygwin.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:53:36 -0500
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: gitk fails to start after updating cygwin
References:	<70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C31294ECBF AT xmb-sjc-233 DOT amer DOT cisco DOT com>
In-reply-to:	<70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C31294ECBF@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 2/24/2012 5:43 PM, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote:
> "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" wrote:
>>
>> Nobody that doesn't need or want it has to install the X-Server.  If
>> one uses gitk though, one has now moved into the category of
> "need/want
>> the X-Server" if one wasn't already in that category. ;-)
>
> Well, they certainly will need/want AN X-Server.  But I thought
> Corrina's point was that in some cases that X-Server does not have to be
> the Cygwin xorg-server (could be a different local X-Server, or even a
> remote X-Server).

True enough, though I expect for most Cygwin users, this is the exception
and not the rule.

> My question is:  are there enough gitk users who would need/want the
> Cygwin xorg-server that it would be worth installing xorg-server by
> default when installing gitk, even though some gitk users may not
> actually need the Cygwin xorg-server?

I would be for adding Cygiwn's xorg-server as a dependency for any
package that needs an X-Server to be generally useful.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -