X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Squirrel-UserHash:	EhVcXl1ERwBcRx0AAAwEUR8f
X-Squirrel-FromHash:	VldYW1gVRgA=
Message-ID:	<04a8b9ac6ac4d02f6f8cc47f949aea69-EhVcXl1ERwBcRx0AAAwEUR8fGQlVS19cWF9EAV1EWEZaOl0IQVdyH1RXWEFaQSoDXFlZQVlVXw9a-webmailer1@server03.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
In-Reply-To:	<20120224082057.GB17797@calimero.vinschen.de>
References:	<20120222192933 DOT 0a8e03f6 DOT tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com> <CAB8Xom93QjbOG2Jycy33GyR4EdCNix5XN3_UDe0TYGpb3vfmeg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20120222223256 DOT 90d4fc28 DOT tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com> <20120223083017 DOT GG7657 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <ji6hq4$gff$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <20120223185023 DOT 78563996 DOT tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com> <CAB8Xom-fT5FsS1X42RYoc9bgNakikJ-AMQEy=fKxy5-eLnQ3kw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20120224020758 DOT 5d4b3dca DOT tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com> <20120224082057 DOT GB17797 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Date:	Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:12:55 +0100
Subject:	Re: more "address space needed ... is already occupied" problems (with snapshot of 2012-02-20)
From:	"Tassilo Philipp" <tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To:	tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com
User-Agent:	Host Europe Webmailer/1.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-HE-Access:	Yes
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> On Feb 24 02:07, Tassilo Philipp wrote:
>> > On my system:
>> >
>> > $ rebase -si |grep etc.so
>> > /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-cygwin/etc.so       base 0x5a1d0000 size
>> 0x00009000
>>
>> I believe you that that is usually the case, however, on my machine,
>> this command doesn't return anything, even with a completely fresh
>> cygwin install, including the ruby package.
>
> What do you mean with "doesn't return anything"?  Do you mean it doesn't
> return anything when piped into grep, or do you mean the output of
> rebase -si is empty?

As pointed out in my other post, etc.so is not in the list of the output
of rebase -si, so grepping for it doesn't return anything.


> In theory neither of this should happen, *iff* you
> used the latest rebase 4.0 for rebasing.

I do.


> Do you have a file
> /etc/rebase.db.i386 on your system?

Yes.


> If not, you should definitely
> update to the latest rebase package and rebase again.  As for etc.so,
> since it's in the list of installed files from the ruby package, it
> should be rebased by default and therefore it should be found in the
> /etc/rebase.db.i386 database by the rebase -si command.  This sounds
> weird.

Well, it isn't on my machine. I don't know why. Maybe I screwed something
up - it just surprises me that I have the same problems with a fresh
(complete) cygwin install with ruby 1.8.7 from the cygwin packages.
Michael's script works like a charm for me, including custom installs of
ruby 1.9, so I'm happy.

Thanks for the help!

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -