X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Received-SPF:	pass (google.com: domain of dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT gmail DOT com designates 10.180.96.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.96.8;
Authentication-Results:	mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT gmail DOT com designates 10.180.96.8 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT gmail DOT com; dkim=pass header.i=dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT gmail DOT com
Message-ID:	<4F47BCD3.8080207@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:37:39 +0000
From:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Spawning Java from C
References:	<4F4678CB DOT 7030900 AT gmail DOT com> <4F469FDF DOT 8010002 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <4F470417 DOT 3060105 AT cygwin DOT com> <loom DOT 20120224T155416-441 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <4F47A7BB DOT 9010304 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
In-Reply-To:	<4F47A7BB.9010304@cs.umass.edu>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 24/02/2012 15:07, Eliot Moss wrote:
> On 2/24/2012 9:57 AM, Jim Rome wrote:
>> Larry Hall (Cygwin<reply-to-list-only-lh<at>  cygwin.com>  writes:
>>>
>>> To the OP, run the same from an elevated prompt and these
>>> errors should disappear.
>>>
>>
>> I tried it also with windows style paths, both using \\ and / as
>> separators with the same results.
>>
>> What does "to the OP" mean?  And are you implying it has to be run
>> as an administrator? MinGW does not require that.
> 
> OP = Original Poster (see the cygwin standard acronyms :-) )
> 
> Yes, the responder *is* saying that you need to run this as
> administrator.  

  No.  He was saying that if you run *cygcheck* from an elevated prompt, you
won't get the "Can't open service" errors.

    cheers,
      DaveK

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -