X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:11:00 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: shared_info::init_obcaseinsensitive implemented incorrectly
Message-ID:	<20120221171100.GM22597@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CADSoG1so=3KxR5TS6mVNRhZGkdUku42Y=S3eWV0dtDgiZE8Tww AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CADSoG1uVEpxOSxAm2ZtbzE9oh95TcAQYkj_YRAZxP0tL8-3uDQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CADSoG1v5skh+gsKmBfVSbykA+AXHJjJEs+oTWsjSav04BvUNzg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CADSoG1uBYBYYW6K+XS-N3ouQN3-x7dYWzR5vQ16DaR2WShd45Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CADSoG1sCUeC=6UCmTmb56pWFoDM0mR9+RT0ozGNRtiaMPsbBCA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CADSoG1vOz3agNFs2dG_u4D-Kw4PBv+YHdJUE_ziSUOCaqdo35g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20120221115510 DOT GG22597 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20120221115510.GG22597@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Feb 21 12:55, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> 
> Please, don't http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
> 
> 
> On Feb 21 11:34, Nick Lowe wrote:
> > I really should subscribe to get individual messages and not just the
> > digest so that I can reply properly. Sorry!
> > 
> > > Just call NtOpenDirectoryObject on \\SYSTEMROOT, rather than NtOpenSymbolicLinkObject.
> > 
> > I would have thought that NtOpenSymbolicLinkObject would have been the
> > more correct approach as the object expected is a symbolic link. No?
> 
> Depends on what you define as correct.  Since you only call the function
> to find out the state of case sensitivity and don't need the handle,
> why not use a function which you know fails in a specific way?
> 
> > >That's not an off-chance.  It works for all admin accounts.
> > 
> > Hmm, strange. Unless the query (0x1) symbolic link specific access
> > right is specified, I always get STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. With it
> > specified, it succeeds as an administrator or fails otherwise.
> 
> I missed that.  You're right, with a 0 access mask it fails with
> STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED.  Well, it works one way or the other, right? :)

I applied a matching patch:

  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2012-q1/msg00115.html


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -