X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_LR,TW_RW,TW_WX,TW_XR,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4F3D7D5F.8010304@alice.it>
Date:	Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:04:15 +0100
From:	Angelo Graziosi <angelo DOT graziosi AT alice DOT it>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: base-files problem
References:	<4F3D73FF DOT 6080608 AT alice DOT it>
In-Reply-To:	<4F3D73FF.6080608@alice.it>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Il 16/02/2012 22.24, Angelo Graziosi ha scritto:
> After the upgrade to 4.0-9, I have
>
> $ ls -lrt /etc/skel/
> totale 0
>
> $ ls -lrt /etc/
> [...]
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6994 16 feb 20.07 profile
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1116 16 feb 20.07 bash.bashrc
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 856 16 feb 20.07 bash.bash_logout
> drwxr-xr-x 1 root Nessuno 0 16 feb 20.07 skel
>
> This ^^^^^^^^
>
> is wrong in my case: I changed passwd/group files so that I should have
> "root root" and not "root Nessuno" (Nessuno == nobody)
>
> Besides this, as you can see, in /etc there is bash.bashrc and
> bash.bash_logout files.. Is this right?
>
> But I notice this too:
>
> As normal user (not root)
>
> $ ls -lrt /etc/defaults/etc/skel/
> ls: impossibile aprire la directory /etc/defaults/etc/skel/: Permission
> denied
>
> As root
>
> $ ls -lrt /etc/defaults/etc/skel/
> totale 0
>
> and
>
> $ ls -lrt /etc/defaults/etc/
> [...]
> drwxrws---+ 1 root root 0 16 feb 20.07 skel
>
> ^^^^^^^^
>
> Are these permissions right?
>
> I think there is some problem here.. I will try to revert to -6...

Downgrading fo 4.0-6 leaves /etc/skel and /etc/defaults/etc/skel 
empty... Is this right?

>
> Ciao,
> Angelo.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -