X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_FC
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4F3A162E.4050808@acm.org>
Date:	Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:07:10 -0800
From:	David Rothenberger <daveroth AT acm DOT org>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: STC for libapr1 failure
References:	<4F3A14A8 DOT 4090506 AT acm DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<4F3A14A8.4090506@acm.org>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 2/14/2012 12:00 AM, David Rothenberger wrote:
> The libapr1 test cases are failing again for flock locks.

I forgot to mention that this same test is failing in the libapr1 test
suite when using fcntl locks. I haven't extracted an STC for that, but
it's probably very similar to the previous one here

  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-08/msg00496.html

with the shared memory counter added.

-- 
David Rothenberger  ----  daveroth AT acm DOT org

The main problem I have with cats is, they're not dogs.
                -- Kevin Cowherd

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -