X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-9.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered:	true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result:	Ak4JAPUdM0+rRDoG/2dsb2JhbABDrhR/gQeBdAEEEgEdClEBKgYYB1cBBBMIEgigd4EnAZ5HiWGCJTcaAgQCBAQDAYMYAYEZASuCOmMEiEaXdodv
x-cr-puzzleid:	{6BF0CA81-0BE7-4A41-B68A-3CB8F950E8E4}
MIME-Version:	1.0
x-cr-hashedpuzzle:	5es= BHLd BacL B5M+ CmXI C+4f DEWL DMv8 EfOx FUyN F8+H GHGR GJM9 G6Gl InWQ IqNr;1;YwB5AGcAdwBpAG4AQABjAHkAZwB3AGkAbgAuAGMAbwBtAA==;Sosha1_v1;7;{6BF0CA81-0BE7-4A41-B68A-3CB8F950E8E4};bQBhAHQAcwBlAGkAdAB6AEAAYwBpAHMAYwBvAC4AYwBvAG0A;Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:17:18 GMT;QwB5AGcAdwBpAG4ALgBkAGwAbAAgAHYAZQByAHMAaQBvAG4AIABpAG4AIABiAHUAZwAgAHIAZQBwAG8AcgB0AHMA
Subject:	Cygwin.dll version in bug reports
Date:	Wed, 8 Feb 2012 17:17:18 -0800
Message-ID:	<70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C31270C212@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com>
From:	"Matt Seitz (matseitz)" <matseitz AT cisco DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q191Hg7d008394

"Christopher Faylor" wrote in message
news:<20120209005328 DOT GB23954 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>...
> 
> Same thing in 1.7.9.
> 
> Please lets not just put 1.7.10 in front of every bug report.

What is the proper procedure?

Today I sent a couple of bug reports.  I based my "Subject" on the "Good
examples" given at:

http://cygwin.com/problems.html

Since all the good examples had a cygwin1.dll version at the front, I
thought that was expected.  So I put 1.7.10 at the front, because that
was the cygwin1.dll version I was using.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -