X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:19:11 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: perl fork error: child_info_fork::abort: data segment start: - example code!
Message-ID:	<20120208151911.GO25129@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<loom DOT 20120208T143015-651 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20120208142712 DOT GK25129 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20120208T154403-845 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<loom.20120208T154403-845@post.gmane.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Feb  8 14:55, Heiko Elger wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> 
> > > So why I will get this error - only cause of symantec?
> > 
> > Perhaps.  Probably.  I'm not sure.  However, the above addresses
> > 0xC1A000 and 0xA6A000 are *very* unlikely DLL load addresses in a
> > Windows system.  Usually DLLs are loaded at addresses beyond
> > 0x10000000, preferredly to the address stored in the DLL header.
> > As I said , I don't no if SEP is really the culprit here, but at
> > least the address are weird.  And...
> 
> Is this perhaps same problem or a side effect as discussed in in 
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/131027/focus=131095?

There is a ML archive at http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/ too.  I'd prefer
to use that since it's the ultimate source ;)

But, no, to the best of my knowledge that's not the same problem.  What
you see is apparently a BLODA problem.

> > The code checks if the data and bss segments of a given DLL, which was
> > already loaded by the parent process, is in the same spot in the child
> > process.  If not, the DLL has been loaded into another address in the
> > child, which will likely result in a nonfunctional forked process.
> 
> Can you tell me where this checking is done.

dll_init.cc, method dll_list::alloc.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -