Mail Archives: cygwin/2012/02/07/12:16:37
On Feb 7 16:12, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 03:25:20PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Feb 7 15:09, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 05:29:27PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> So, here are two questions:
> >>
> >> - Since you *knew* that the process.h header had moved for a month
> >> (after all, it is "as for every snapshot"), why didn't you say a single
> >> word that this may result in a problem with building gcc?
> I didn't know because /usr/include/process.h was still there. Only a
> "tar tvf" told me this today. Perhaps we should do:
>
> rm `tar tf <last-cygwin-package-installed>` # you got the idea
> before
> tar xf <new-cygwin-package-to-install> # here also
>
> at any cygwin package switch? Or at least compare the respective
> results of "tar tf". What do you think?
> >>
> >> - Why is that such a big problem? Changing process.h to cygwin/process.h
> >> should work, right?
> Oh yes, sure. When you have the necessary pieces it's rather easy.
> For the record, also perl-5.14.2 seems broken.
I moved the file back to /usr/include for the next release, which will
probably not be too far in the future...
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -