delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <4F2C472C.1080403@t-online.de> |
Date: | Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:44:28 +0100 |
From: | Christian Franke <Christian DOT Franke AT t-online DOT de> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110928 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Slow stat() on noacl mounts due to x permission check |
References: | <4F2C2589 DOT 2000907 AT t-online DOT de> <20120203191349 DOT GH30293 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> |
In-Reply-To: | <20120203191349.GH30293@calimero.vinschen.de> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 3 19:20, Christian Franke wrote: >> Cygwin stat() may be much slower on noacl mounts than on acl >> mounts.This is because on noacl mounts the x-permission bit is >> guessed by checking for "#!", ":" or "MZ" in the first bytes of the >> file. AFAIKS this is done for all files except *.exe, *.lnk and >> *.com. >> >> A real world testcase with 20120201 snapshot on a (C++/Java >> development) tree with ~52000 files in ~12000 dirs: >> >> . noacl acl >> find -size ... (after boot) 518s 51s >> find -size ... (disk cached) 13s 8s >> find -name ... (disk cached) 3s 3s (does not need stat()) >> >> Is it really needed to do the header check for each file? >> >> Would it break important use cases if the check is only done for >> files with typical script file extensions? >> For example: no extension, .sh, .csh, .pl, .py, ... >> >> Another more flexible solution would be a mount option to configure this. >> (xguess=0: no check; 1: some extensions only; 2: all files) > We already have the exec/notexec/cygexec mount options, see > http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using.html#mount-table > > Somehow I misunderstood the notexec option. Sorry for the noise. Christian -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |