delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <4F2C2589.2000907@t-online.de> |
References: | <4F2C2589 DOT 2000907 AT t-online DOT de> |
Date: | Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:54:22 -0500 |
Message-ID: | <CA+sc5mnzhwdK5ZLMFhJQk3i41p_1hJj=+tG7Qp51=4PVqGC8Gg@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: Slow stat() on noacl mounts due to x permission check |
From: | Earnie Boyd <earnie AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q13IsgjF000739 |
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Christian Franke <Christian DOT Franke AT t-online DOT de> wrote: > Cygwin stat() may be much slower on noacl mounts than on acl mounts.This is > because on noacl mounts the x-permission bit is guessed by checking for > "#!", ":" or "MZ" in the first bytes of the file. AFAIKS this is done for > all files except *.exe, *.lnk and *.com. > > A real world testcase with 20120201 snapshot on a (C++/Java development) > tree with ~52000 files in ~12000 dirs: > > .               noacl  acl > find -size ... (after boot)  518s  51s > find -size ... (disk cached)  13s  8s > find -name ... (disk cached)   3s  3s (does not need stat()) > > Is it really needed to do the header check for each file? > Yes. > Would it break important use cases if the check is only done for files with > typical script file extensions? > For example: no extension, .sh, .csh, .pl, .py, ... > Yes it would break my use of this feature. > Another more flexible solution would be a mount option to configure this. > (xguess=0: no check; 1: some extensions only; 2: all files) > The default should be the existing behavior. -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |