delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2012/02/03/13:54:46

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4F2C2589.2000907@t-online.de>
References: <4F2C2589 DOT 2000907 AT t-online DOT de>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:54:22 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+sc5mnzhwdK5ZLMFhJQk3i41p_1hJj=+tG7Qp51=4PVqGC8Gg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Slow stat() on noacl mounts due to x permission check
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q13IsgjF000739

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Christian Franke
<Christian DOT Franke AT t-online DOT de> wrote:
> Cygwin stat() may be much slower on noacl mounts than on acl mounts.This is
> because on noacl mounts the x-permission bit is guessed by checking for
> "#!", ":" or "MZ" in the first bytes of the file. AFAIKS this is done for
> all files except *.exe, *.lnk and *.com.
>
> A real world testcase with 20120201 snapshot on a (C++/Java development)
> tree with ~52000 files in ~12000 dirs:
>
> .                            noacl  acl
> find -size ... (after boot)   518s  51s
> find -size ... (disk cached)   13s   8s
> find -name ... (disk cached)    3s   3s (does not need stat())
>
> Is it really needed to do the header check for each file?
>

Yes.

> Would it break important use cases if the check is only done for files with
> typical script file extensions?
> For example: no extension, .sh, .csh, .pl, .py, ...
>

Yes it would break my use of this feature.

> Another more flexible solution would be a mount option to configure this.
> (xguess=0: no check; 1: some extensions only; 2: all files)
>

The default should be the existing behavior.

-- 
Earnie
-- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple


- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019