X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	Guy Harrison <swampdog AT ntlworld DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: IBM ssh gateway
Date:	Thu, 2 Feb 2012 20:18:59 +0000
User-Agent:	KMail/1.9.9
References:	<201202011046 DOT 40681 DOT swampdog AT ntlworld DOT com> <201202012311 DOT 29012 DOT swampdog AT ntlworld DOT com> <4F2A1363 DOT 6020206 AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<4F2A1363.6020206@cygwin.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-Id:	<201202022018.59380.swampdog@ntlworld.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

[snip]
> > ..unfortunately I can't post the value for SSH_USER but as previously
> > posted SSH_GATE is "198.81.193.104". Is it possible for others to try..
> > $ ssh -vv 198.81.193.104
> > ..as that's enough to trigger the fault.

On Thursday 02 February 2012 04:38:59 Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>
> Indeed.  I do see that even if I limit authentication methods to
> password. And it does go through OK if I use a web client (serfish).

Thanks for the help guys. I have raised a problem report with IBM and will 
let the list know the outcome. It may be some time though, software issues 
can take a few weeks!

TIA
Guy

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -