X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:36:57 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: find in root (/) results in stack trace
Message-ID:	<20120202153657.GA18227@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<loom DOT 20120201T135424-360 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20120201150054 DOT GA29431 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20120201T175150-313 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20120202085645 DOT GB25077 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20120202085645.GB25077@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Feb  2 09:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb  1 16:54, Heiko Elger wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > 
> > > 
> > > This looks like a problem when recursing over the /proc/registry and
> > > it doesn't look like a 64 bit problem.  I'll have a look.
> > > 
> > 
> > I saw same problem runing find command i.e. /cygdrive/c/Programme/cygwin (root 
> > of my cygwin installation) ad there is no /proc/registry.
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> I concentrated on the registry yesterday and I found a memory and a
> handle leak there, which were a result of find using open/fdopendir/
> closedir.  This skips the close call and the registry closedir code
> wasn't handling that at all.
> 
> Given that find wastes a lot of memory when scanning ordinary disks,
> too, there's apparently still another memory leak somewhere.  I'm going
> to have another look today.

I've created a new snapshot 2012-02-02.  Can you please test it?  AFAICS
I got rid of the memory leak.  A recent change broke the fdopendir
handling entirely, apparently.  I tested it with a full `find /' scan and
I didn't have any problem...

...except that find ran into an infinite loop in /proc/registry.  It
turned out that this is a result of registry virtualization under UAC.
I fixed that by treating the affected registry keys(*) as symlink,
rather than as directory.


Corinna


(*) every key ending in "VirtualStore/MACHINE/SOFTWARE/Classes".

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -