X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4F08B185.7050709@dancol.org>
References:	<CAAJ38WVH3UEqBOj9kBVh5PeMnXs9evWxJ5uSK77xJxOyd13XRg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4F08B185 DOT 7050709 AT dancol DOT org>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:12:56 -0500
Message-ID:	<CAAJ38WXHEy2PT2br9W=1MBEpxCCxv5BbHxFfcLZES2XbkHFyYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Does Cygwin Terminal queue output to stdout?
From:	inetjunkmail <inetjunkmail AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q09GDNPP014586

>> When I run tshark or windump in a cmd.exe window (e.g. "tshark -i1
>> -n") I see immediate output of network traffic seen by my network
>> interface and continues to stream live network traffic information.
>>
>> When I run either program in Cygwin Terminal, there is about a 20
>> second delay before I see any output.  At which time it immediately
>> dumps the previous 20 seconds of "queued up" output and hangs again
>> for 15-20 seconds, followed by another dump of "queued up" output,
>> etc...
>>
>> Is there some way I can have Cygwin Terminal stream the data like cmd.exe does?
>
> From the point of view of these programs, mintty is a pipe. When a
> program thinks it's writing to a display (a tty), it typically flushes
> the output after every line. But when a program thinks the user won't
> see its output, a program typically flushes its buffers less often
> because writing in larger chunks is more efficient. You need to
> convince these non-Cygwin programs to not buffer their output. Have
> you tried the conin utility?
>
> https://code.google.com/p/mintty/source/browse/utils/conin.c
>

In case anyone is searching this in the future, windump and tshark
both have a command line switch of "-l" that flushes standard output
after each packet.  Using this resolves the issue.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -