X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4EF3C8C3.1020605@shaddybaddah.name>
Date:	Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:18:11 +1100
From:	Shaddy Baddah <lithium-cygwin AT shaddybaddah DOT name>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] CALL FOR TESTING: Cygwin 1.7.10
References:	<announce DOT 20111206093746 DOT GA6222 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4EF2D79D DOT 2020809 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <20111222092552 DOT GA31936 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4EF3027A DOT 7090503 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <20111222104443 DOT GC31936 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4EF31077 DOT 8060705 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <20111222111951 DOT GD31936 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4EF32BAC DOT 6060209 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <20111222143338 DOT GE31936 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4EF342F8 DOT 2060001 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <20111222154038 DOT GJ31936 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20111222154038.GJ31936@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi Corinna,


On 23/12/11 02:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 23 01:47, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>> On 23/12/11 01:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> Other than that I might have a solution.  I applied a patch which only
>>> adds the CREATE_BREAKAWAY_FROM_JOB flag if the calling process is member
>>> of a job and the job allows a breakaway.  It works in my limited
>>> testing, but it would be important to know if it works for you, too, of
>>> course.  If you're not set up to build your own Cygwin DLL, please test
>>> the next developer snapshot.
>> Yes, unfortunately I am not set up at the moment to build dlls, so
>> I'll eagerly await the next snapshot.
> Uploaded.

Yes, this is working now. Thank you very much.

I will still try and see if our desktop support will allow me to
disable the virus scanner for a short period to test if it made a
difference with that faltering dll. I'll report back in due course.

Thanks again,
Shaddy


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -