X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4EF29183.8060408@shaddybaddah.name>
Date:	Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:10:11 +1100
From:	Shaddy Baddah <lithium-cygwin AT shaddybaddah DOT name>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: sftp-server -h succeeds on cmd, fails on mintty
References:	<4EF28545 DOT 4090901 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <4EF28709 DOT 8000208 AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<4EF28709.8000208@cygwin.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi Larry,

On 22/12/11 12:25, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 8:17 PM, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm experiencing a wider problem with sftp'ing to/from a Cygwin sshd
>> service. However as a starting point into debugging, I've identified a
>> simple failure in the sftp-server that may give an indication into the
>> wider problem.
>>
>> When I ran just a simple usage argument to sftp-server in a mintty
>> session, the command failed:
>>
>> sbaddah@*********** ~
>> $ /usr/sbin/sftp-server -h; x=$?; echo $x
>> 127
>
> This works fine for me from mintty.  Just a shot in the dark but can
> you try it with a local user?  How about a local user that's part of
> the local Administrators group?

Yes, this has made a difference. Thank you. I ran against a local
user, although they were not a local administrator. It ran fine:

portapps@*********** ~
$ /usr/sbin/sftp-server -h
usage: sftp-server [-ehR] [-f log_facility] [-l log_level] [-u umask]

I guess that points towards a pseudo terminal handling glitch for a
domain user, right?

Regards,
Shaddy

>
>


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -