X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<jcfr4q$ulp$1@dough.gmane.org>
References:	<jcatmu$5d8$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <4EE90067 DOT 9020109 AT bopp DOT net> <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A20A43E78632 AT NIHMLBX02 DOT nih DOT gov> <jcb85e$n8i$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <jce0v9$eis$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <4EEABDB8 DOT 4020307 AT cygwin DOT com> <jcfr4q$ulp$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>
Date:	Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:46:45 -0500
Message-ID:	<CAG_2cTnDxK+KW+Ck24wPPRs+yEoq5dSUrZnsC2crGvz5oLR76g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Symlinks and sharing a home directory between Windows and Linux
From:	Jon Clugston <jon DOT clugston AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id pBGGl99d031168

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Andrew DeFaria <Andrew AT defaria DOT com> wrote:
> On 12/15/2011 07:40 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>
>> I'm having difficulty seeing how what you have described could work unless
>> the consumers of these files are looking for symlinks only, which your
>> example above contradicts.  And both of the ".bashrc" files are registering
>> as plain files, so I think you're right that the file system on which they
>> reside is coming into play, assuming the output above is from Cygwin's 'ls'.
>>  But even if you had ".bashrc" and ".bashrc.lnk" with the former being a
>> UNIX-form of symlink and the latter being the Cygwin one, I'd still expect
>> Cygwin to recognize ".bashrc" first and only go looking for the .lnk version
>> if it couldn't find that.
>
> I would think that Cygwin should see the .lnk version first. No? I guess
> not. I thought it worked that way before.

This would be a performance disaster - forcing a check for 'x.lnk'
every time the software tried to access file 'x'.  I doubt that it
worked that way before.


>>
>> The output of strace may convince you of that as well. ;-)  It might
>> actually work as you describe it though if
>> you can get Cygwin to think that it can't open the former.  I could see
>> that being the case if the UNIX symlink was created by a user ID Cygwin
>> didn't recognize, for example.
>
> I've backed off to using hardlinks which work on both systems but it doesn't
> work for directories.
> --
> Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
> Accept that some days you're the pigeon, and some days you're the statue.
>
>
> --
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -