X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Mail-Handler:	MailHop Outbound by DynDNS
X-Report-Abuse-To:	abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User:	U2FsdGVkX1+optzaJ9AhXFR06fcgdYr+
Date:	Fri, 9 Dec 2011 00:56:13 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] CALL FOR TESTING: Cygwin 1.7.10
Message-ID:	<20111209055613.GC25544@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<announce DOT 20111206093746 DOT GA6222 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <von1e7hvt0m3db5k04cmutg015h7ik0557 AT 4ax DOT com> <20111208184447 DOT GC11458 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <bjc2e71unkjf6o8pl3sr22jtplp47v2c3b AT 4ax DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<bjc2e71unkjf6o8pl3sr22jtplp47v2c3b@4ax.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:00:11PM +0100, Bengt Larsson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:06:21PM +0100, Bengt Larsson wrote:
>>>With the DLL from 20111208, a bug seems to have returned:
>>>
>>>Wildcard match fail from a windows shell with non-ASCII characters
>>>
>>>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-12/msg01079.html
>>
>>PLEASE be precise when reporting problems.  Returned from where?
>>1.7.9?  A snapshot from a week ago?  A snapshot from a day ago?
>
>From the time I reported the bug in the link. This bug behaves
>identically. Should I describe it again or can you click the link?

Your use of "seem to have returned" implies that the problem went away
at some point.  Since the above link is from a time when the problem was
extant it isn't really useful to point at it.

Again, what would be useful is some hint of when you think the problem
went away.  Again, if you are reporting that it worked in 1.7.9 but
stopped working in a snapshot then that is something useful to know.  If
you are just saying that you reported a bug two years ago and you notice
that the bug is still there, that is not something that we urgently need
to fix in 1.7.10 since it isn't a regression.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -