X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4EE0E470.1070506@cornell.edu>
Date:	Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:23:12 -0500
From:	Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] CALL FOR TESTING: Cygwin 1.7.10
References:	<announce DOT 20111206093746 DOT GA6222 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <566vd7hfmi3j980ic4m64d7bv91b5qm6uh AT 4ax DOT com> <20111207173808 DOT GA25743 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <lq9vd7hue8mef2rkdjpnljn12bm0r6ftum AT 4ax DOT com> <20111207180653 DOT GB25743 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20111208T012903-910 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <CAHWeT-ardWG6ExK+p7Jvx6SCRs9+7zGHnVEip3PapnMhTLcw4g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <loom DOT 20111208T153653-206 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <4EE0D2F3 DOT 1090606 AT cornell DOT edu> <loom DOT 20111208T165029-904 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<loom.20111208T165029-904@post.gmane.org>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 12/8/2011 10:56 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Ken Brown writes:
>>
>> I don't use lyx (though I use tex extensively), so maybe there's
>> something I don't understand.  But is it really necessary for Cygwin's
>> lyx to support a native Windows tex?
>
> Necessary? No. Useful? Yes.
>
>> Wouldn't it be more reasonable for
>> users of a native Windows tex to use a native Windows lyx?
>
> Until recently, the only Cygwin TeX engine was teTeX, which does not
> support XeTeX. If you wanted a Cygwin version of lyx, you could not
> have used XeTeX, unless you used MikTeX, for example.

That changed a couple of years ago.  TeX Live has supported Cygwin since 
TL2009.

Ken


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -