X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<1323051626.6872.9.camel@YAAKOV04>
Subject:	Re: libneon27 requires libproxy1 which requires libglib2.0_0
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
To:	cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Date:	Sun, 04 Dec 2011 20:20:26 -0600
In-Reply-To:	<CAGHSphZsRm7DxB-TPsHPTborUBQOMbqmJjYLjW5pxENDxj-ymg@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CAGHSphZsRm7DxB-TPsHPTborUBQOMbqmJjYLjW5pxENDxj-ymg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 02:13 -0500, Matthew Smith wrote:
> After running setup.exe to add a package I noticed something had decided
> to pull in some gnome libraries. As best I can tell its due to libneon27
> requiring libproxy1 though I may be missing something else. I did manage
> to find this regarding libproxy.

The latest libneon27 does require libproxy1-0.4.7, which pulls in only
libglib2.0_0, and I wouldn't count that as "some gnome libraries".

> From http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-05/msg00605.html
> >libproxy pulls in these packages as dependencies for its GNOME and KDE
> >integration modules.  libproxy was added as a libsoup-gnome dependency,
> >for which these deps are anyways required.  But if neon is going to use
> >libproxy as well, these modules are not strictly required, so I removed
> >their deps from libproxy0/setup.hint (and from the upcoming libproxy1
> >as well).
> 
> So hopefully nothing else has changed and it's easy to fix.

I'm not sure what your question is here.  There's nothing here to "fix".


Yaakov



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -