X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.NEB.4.64.1111291410120.19989@panix3.panix.com>
References:	<4ED4F78D DOT 303 AT redhat DOT com> <2BF01EB27B56CC478AD6E5A0A28931F2039D9646 AT A1DAL1SWPES19MB DOT ams DOT acs-inc DOT net> <Pine DOT NEB DOT 4 DOT 64 DOT 1111291410120 DOT 19989 AT panix3 DOT panix DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:10:33 -0500
Message-ID:	<CACUHbYN4HbU+roDRLJH8BZY-DTDR3u_fXAww=SXgKaXr=wvFGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Shell script - is this expected behaviour?
From:	DSB <yahoo AT boyski DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Tim McDaniel <tmcd AT panix DOT com> wrote:
> I don't have the time to experiment at the moment...

Likewise, but it seems likely some existing utilities like "line" or
"head -n1" might do the job. E.g.

foo=$(line < file)
foo=$(head -n1 file)

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -