| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
| X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_CG,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| X-Yahoo-SMTP: | jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:22:02 -0500 |
| From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com> |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: fork problem on latest cygwin CVS |
| Message-ID: | <20111115192202.GB18893@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
| Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| References: | <4EC12860 DOT 3050507 AT gmail DOT com> <20111114153109 DOT GA21295 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4EC13D23 DOT 8040705 AT gmail DOT com> <20111114171105 DOT GA22991 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4EC27F70 DOT 60102 AT gmail DOT com> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: | <4EC27F70.60102@gmail.com> |
| User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:04:16PM +0100, marco atzeri wrote: >On 11/14/2011 6:11 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> FYI, the last thing any developer wants to hear after a major code >> change is a generic "It's broke" report with no details and no way to >> duplicate the problem. A stack trace from a home-grown version of >> cygwin1.dll is not a detail. It's meaningless unless the addresses are >> decoded. >> >> cgf > >Ok, >rewinding to step 1 > >I simplified the test case to a short one, involving just 1 make call, >using your snapshot Amazingly short. Thanks very much! I can duplicate this and will fix it. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |