delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <4EC2916B.9010400@cs.utoronto.ca> |
Date: | Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:20:59 -0500 |
From: | Ryan Johnson <ryan DOT johnson AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [SOLVED] Re: What updates done after October 3 may affect gfortran built binaries? |
References: | <1320840871 DOT 13045 DOT 51 DOT camel AT kare-desktop> <4EC28AE7 DOT 70600 AT gmail DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <4EC28AE7.70600@gmail.com> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 15/11/2011 10:53 AM, Dave Korn wrote: > On 09/11/2011 12:15, Edvardsen KÃ¥re wrote: >> This is again related to the failure of execution of a gfortran built >> binary ("cannot execute binary", see thread >> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-11/msg00034.html ) >> >> In short, the main problem is that I can't build a successful binary >> from the FLEXPART fortran code > > I helped Edvardsen to track this down off-list. It turns out that FLEXPART > is one of those huge number-crunching Fortran programs that's just jam-packed > with ginormous multi-dimensional arrays. The final linked executable had 3.38 > GB of .bss space! So, it's not too surprising that it didn't load on 32-bit > Windows; and it's not, as I was worrying, any explicit bug in the compiler or > binutils (although it may be arguable that ld could be helpful if it issued > some kind of warning in these circumstances). Out of curiosity, how then was the OP ever able to make *any* version run? Ryan -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |