X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Mark Geisert <mark AT maxrnd DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Problem with execution of binary file
Date:	Thu, 3 Nov 2011 19:53:37 +0000 (UTC)
Lines:	10
Message-ID:	<loom.20111103T205109-148@post.gmane.org>
References:	<1320322806 DOT 5480 DOT 161 DOT camel AT kare-desktop> <4EB29564 DOT 8050609 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <1320329429 DOT 5480 DOT 186 DOT camel AT kare-desktop>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Edvardsen KÃ¥re writes:
> Here is a few lines of "od -b" output from both the working and bad
> binary, respectively.
[...]

Maybe more fruitful would be 'objdump -fp' run on both good and bad versions?

..mark




--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -