Mail Archives: cygwin/2011/10/17/03:00:00
On Oct 16 14:42, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 12:54 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >Consensus does appear to be unanimous on what to do; I just need to
> >review all the postings and figure out exactly /how/ to do it.
>
> I have uploaded the new packages. There are three new patches:
>
> 1) modified localename.c significantly. No longer "ignores"
> LANG=C.UTF-8; also does not try to do any parsing of the Windows
> I18N settings. Basically, acts like linux -- if the value of the
> locale string isn't supported by the underlying setlocale()
> implementation, then it is ignored (e.g. default back to "C.UTF-8"
> or "C") -- libintl doesn't try to 'be smart' -- or to second-guess.
> Also, relies on cygwin's glibc-like setlocale(LC_*, NULL) behavior
> -- which has been supported by newlib since the cygwin 1.5 days
> (even if it always returned "C" back then).
Thanks!
> 2) Fixes to the test suite related to the above changes.
>
> 3) Adopted Bruno's upstream changes to relocatable.c, turning off
> "expensive" relocation support in libintl.
>
> Odds of #1 and #2 being adopted upstream are effectively nil, so...
I don't understand this. It's very clear that the former, unfixed
behaviour is totally wrong for Cygwin, especially in terms of the
used charset. I don't see why doing the right thing, using less special
cases for Cygwin in gettext/libintl should be unacceptable for upstream.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -