| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
| X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: | true |
| X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: | v=1.1 cv=I0jFHxriRJwyplOnjK2nOSNCO7GacXBAI5CCNqI8fuI= c=1 sm=1 a=W5crty74aesA:10 a=Bqtapk49eCgA:10 a=SV9grZ613K4A:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=i7s4YuWtaOcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=IaHBZPgZ0vV7m0nTkA8unw==:17 a=2KUf1mbJAAAA:8 a=vt4-FNnFXFX0bfqKlNMA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=NsFnkn2YGo8A:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 |
| To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| Subject: | Re: stdio.h: broken standard compliance. |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Date: | Sun, 09 Oct 2011 11:23:07 -0700 |
| From: | Kaz Kylheku <kaz AT kylheku DOT com> |
| In-Reply-To: | <011d066ef0c80ba22bccc432fbc1b5fc@127.0.0.1> |
| References: | <011d066ef0c80ba22bccc432fbc1b5fc AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1> |
| Message-ID: | <be85065e5a355059f429f59dfec6271c@127.0.0.1> |
| X-Sender: | kaz AT kylheku DOT com |
| User-Agent: | Roundcube Webmail/0.4 |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 11:08:58 -0700, Kaz Kylheku <kaz AT kylheku DOT com>
wrote:
> reason, I cannot get a warning about fileno from this test case if
> I add a reference to it. I will try to produce a minimal repro test
> case for that.
In my real program I have -Wall, and I'm not taking the function
pointers.
With -Wall we get warnings about implicit declarations.
So, here is a better test case which shows that these identifiers are
not declared when they should be. Of course the two errors occur
without -Wall.
$ cat posix-ansi.c
#include <stdio.h>
void foo(void)
{
int (*f1)(FILE *) = fileno;
int (*f2)(FILE *) = pclose;
}
int main(void)
{
int x = fileno(stdin);
pclose(NULL);
return 0;
}
$ gcc -Wall -ansi -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=2 posix-ansi.c
posix-ansi.c: In function 'foo':
posix-ansi.c:5:23: error: 'fileno' undeclared (first use in this
function)
posix-ansi.c:5:23: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only
once for ea
ch function it appears in
posix-ansi.c:6:23: error: 'pclose' undeclared (first use in this
function)
posix-ansi.c:6:9: warning: unused variable 'f2'
posix-ansi.c:5:9: warning: unused variable 'f1'
posix-ansi.c: In function 'main':
posix-ansi.c:11:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'fileno'
posix-ansi.c:12:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pclose'
posix-ansi.c:11:7: warning: unused variable 'x'
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |