X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_CG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<32581457.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Oct 2011 03:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
From:	"jan.kolar" <kolar AT math DOT cas DOT cz>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION
In-Reply-To:	<20111002234602.GA22554@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<32557806 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4E859D04 DOT 3040902 AT gmail DOT com> <32569776 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4E85E693 DOT 1060705 AT gmail DOT com> <32576940 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <20111002234602 DOT GA22554 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Christopher Faylor-8 wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 03:12:39AM -0700, Marc Girod wrote:
>>marco atzeri-4 wrote:
>>> My experience is that using the standard "problem report" improve the
>>> chance to correctly identify the root cause and reduce the number of
>>> guess that everyone could have.
>>> 
>>One problem I have is that I use this list via the (old) nabble web site,
>>and this one doesn't let me post attachments.
>>Now, I had a different issue, from my other (home) laptop, and I tried
>>to send a mail with the cygcheck.out as an attachment from my gmail
>>account. I didn't get a reply of any kind (checked my spam folder) and
>>I do not see the message appear here (sent Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 12:45 PM)
> 
> If the message isn't in the list archives it didn't reach the list.
> 
> cgf
> 

That means, you should check http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/ to see, if the
message arrived to cygwin at cygwin dot com. 
Nothing that contains an email address in the body is accepted by the list,
but I received an email with complaints in such situation.

There is a problem with nabble, that it sometimes shows post with a delay o
several days.
This also implies nabble can claim your posts (through nabble) were not
(yet) accepted by the list for several days, the delay is however not at
cygwin list. 
I'm writing this because it can hold you from identifying the problem
properly.

To test the nabble attachments, I send a body of nabble delay mail. 
http://old.nabble.com/file/p32581457/nabble_delay.txt nabble_delay.txt 
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION-tp32557806p32581457.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -