delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_MK |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <4E871BAF.3040106@redhat.com> |
Date: | Sat, 01 Oct 2011 07:54:55 -0600 |
From: | Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20110906 Fedora/3.1.14-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.14 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Different commands give different groups |
References: | <32572751 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <32572751.post@talk.nabble.com> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 09/30/2011 09:49 PM, gsingh93 wrote: > > Why do these two commands give different groups? It's the same user. Because the effective gid set for the existing process differs from the recorded groups in /etc/groups - most likely, you've changed /etc/groups but haven't logged out and back in to start a new process hierarchy that uses the new groups. > > Gulshan AT GSJK-PC /etc > $ id Gulshan > uid=1000(Gulshan) gid=545(Users) groups=545(Users),0(root) That's what the groups will be if a new process is started for Gulshan. > > Gulshan AT GSJK-PC /etc > $ id > uid=1000(Gulshan) gid=545(Users) groups=545(Users),513(None) Whereas that's what the groups are now for the current process. This aspect of your situation is not cygwin-specific, the same behavior can be observed in other OSs when you change the user database after a particular user already has a process started. > > Furthermore, the commands mkgroup and mkpasswd give the orginial states of > their corresponding files instead of what I changed them to. Why is that? This part is cygwin-specific - and the answer is that mkgroup and mkpasswd are querying Window's database of user information, not /etc (so that you can then populate /etc with information that matches the Window's database). Windows doesn't care what you put in /etc, so the amount of changes you can make in those files that still have a worthwhile visible effect to cygwin processes is a bit limited. -- Eric Blake eblake AT redhat DOT com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |