X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SARE_SUB_MINUTES,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Andrew Schulman <schulman DOT andrew AT epamail DOT epa DOT gov>
Subject:	Re: date is off of system clock by about 9 minutes
Date:	Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:34:38 -0400
Lines:	14
Message-ID:	<24u287pde8aam11ap6nba6i3n92do8p6e9@4ax.com>
References:	<7f11875iun9ve00e3d598kneo19s7m0v23 AT 4ax DOT com> <jr6187dh6mm85b7t7il8m88dkd2icnptes AT 4ax DOT com> <loom DOT 20110926T222920-681 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Archive:	encrypt
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> Andrew Schulman writes:
> > > Both 'date' and 'ls' show times that are ahead of the system clock by about 9
> > > minutes, 24 seconds.
> > 
> > I just ran rebaseall for other reasons (bzr again), and now the problem has
> > disappeared.
> 
> Check the archives for why the problem occurs; it's been brought up before.  But
> stopping all Cygwin processes, as one does for rebaseall, causes 'date' and
> system clock to be in sync again in new Cygwin processes afterwards.  So you've
> coincidentally done the exact fix required.  Be happy.

Thanks.  It took a while but I found the explanation at
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-03/msg00838.html.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -