X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SARE_SUB_MINUTES,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Mark Geisert <mark AT maxrnd DOT com>
Subject:	Re: date is off of system clock by about 9 minutes
Date:	Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:35:10 +0000 (UTC)
Lines:	14
Message-ID:	<loom.20110926T222920-681@post.gmane.org>
References:	<7f11875iun9ve00e3d598kneo19s7m0v23 AT 4ax DOT com> <jr6187dh6mm85b7t7il8m88dkd2icnptes AT 4ax DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Andrew Schulman writes:
> > Both 'date' and 'ls' show times that are ahead of the system clock by about 9
> > minutes, 24 seconds.
> 
> I just ran rebaseall for other reasons (bzr again), and now the problem has
> disappeared.

Check the archives for why the problem occurs; it's been brought up before.  But
stopping all Cygwin processes, as one does for rebaseall, causes 'date' and
system clock to be in sync again in new Cygwin processes afterwards.  So you've
coincidentally done the exact fix required.  Be happy.

..mark



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -