delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <4E801B9A.4060002@gmail.com> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:28:42 +0200 |
From: | Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: rebaseall and cygstdc++-6.dll |
References: | <4E6AC3F4 DOT 1090401 AT gmail DOT com> <4E7EC532 DOT 9020306 AT gmail DOT com> <CAGHJv4fk9m_eqg6Gv+UezzUFD5sNuw9yzu-fUNeaO9nG+9zjeA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4E7FD234 DOT 70102 AT gmail DOT com> <1317006915 DOT 8692 DOT 1 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> |
In-Reply-To: | <1317006915.8692.1.camel@YAAKOV04> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 9/26/2011 5:15 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 02:15 +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >> The problem is in binutils, and the fact that it generates base relocs for >> entries from EH data that should be just ignored. >> >> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-09/msg00174.html >> contains more detail, if you want to ask more let's do it on the binutils list. >> >> So to answer your question: the gcc language-specific runtime DLLs have to >> be built using the patched version of binutils, otherwise they break when they >> get rebased; that's why I'm rebuilding the gcc packages - having already >> locally rebuilt binutils. This will only be a big issue for anyone who wants >> to rebuild gcc from source themselves, the new packages I upload to the distro >> will still work for everyone regardless of what binutils they have installed >> and/or how or when or where they get rebased. > > Except that this issue doesn't affect only libstdc++, but any C++ > library which throws exceptions (as I have seen on my system). So we > really do need a patched binutils ASAP. > There is an easy way to identify such libraries ? Just to know if I need to rebuild some of mines . > > Yaakov > Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |