X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Subject:	Re: rebaseall and cygstdc++-6.dll
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
To:	cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Date:	Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:15:13 -0500
In-Reply-To:	<4E7FD234.70102@gmail.com>
References:	<4E6AC3F4 DOT 1090401 AT gmail DOT com> <4E7EC532 DOT 9020306 AT gmail DOT com> <CAGHJv4fk9m_eqg6Gv+UezzUFD5sNuw9yzu-fUNeaO9nG+9zjeA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4E7FD234 DOT 70102 AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID:	<1317006915.8692.1.camel@YAAKOV04>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 02:15 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>   The problem is in binutils, and the fact that it generates base relocs for
> entries from EH data that should be just ignored.
> 
>   http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-09/msg00174.html
> contains more detail, if you want to ask more let's do it on the binutils list.
> 
>   So to answer your question: the gcc language-specific runtime DLLs have to
> be built using the patched version of binutils, otherwise they break when they
> get rebased; that's why I'm rebuilding the gcc packages - having already
> locally rebuilt binutils.  This will only be a big issue for anyone who wants
> to rebuild gcc from source themselves, the new packages I upload to the distro
> will still work for everyone regardless of what binutils they have installed
> and/or how or when or where they get rebased.

Except that this issue doesn't affect only libstdc++, but any C++
library which throws exceptions (as I have seen on my system).  So we
really do need a patched binutils ASAP.


Yaakov



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -