X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_BJ,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4E709F16.2050002@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:33:26 +0200
From:	Marco atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: plotting from octave: address space already occupied, fork aborts
References:	<loom DOT 20110914T045158-624 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <4E703F00 DOT 8020101 AT gmail DOT com> <4E709C95 DOT 3070600 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca>
In-Reply-To:	<4E709C95.3070600@cs.utoronto.ca>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 9/14/2011 2:22 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> On 14/09/2011 1:43 AM, Marco atzeri wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>> your problem is a new one :-(
>>
>> max.oct is a dll of octave, and its base address is not 004F0000
>>
>> $ objdump -p /lib/octave/3.4.2/oct/i686-pc-cygwin/max.oct |grep ImageBase
>>
>> ImageBase 686c0000
>>
>> I guess that another dll is loaded at 686c0000, so max.oct
>> is loaded too near at 004000000, the base address of any exe
>>
>> $ objdump -p /bin/gnuplot.exe |grep ImageBase
>> ImageBase 00400000
>>
>> $ objdump -p /bin/octave-3.4.2.exe |grep ImageBase
>> ImageBase 00400000
>>
>> So when octave fork gnuplot, gnuplot take that address space
>> and max.oct can not be loaded at the previous 004F0000.
>>
>> peflagsall is not aware that .oct are also dll, so you could try with
>>
>> $ peflagsall -s 'exe|dll|so|oct'
> Wouldn't rebaseall need similar treatment? My understanding from Corinna
> is that peflagsall is not particularly helpful (though not harmful either).

Hi Ryan,
PEBKC on this side.
I was thinking of rebaseall and writing of peflagsall.

The right command should be:

$ rebaseall -s 'dll|so|oct'

Regards
Marco

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -