X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Yahoo-SMTP:	jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o-
Date:	Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:29:49 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: stable compiler package gcc4-4.5.3-2
Message-ID:	<20110908202949.GA32219@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<announce DOT 4E60524C DOT 2000401 AT gmail DOT com> <CAPw2spgAfEF-vLrWeoFTA28Xtt5WcvYS+mVqq9RUqi4CYk84rQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4E68AA10 DOT 4070205 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <CAPw2spgdvGCJSBvcigsKhqoUnOinG2UGmN2jVg3qQxRvZ2uxjA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAPw2spgdvGCJSBvcigsKhqoUnOinG2UGmN2jVg3qQxRvZ2uxjA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:17:57PM +0200, Fr?d?ric Bron wrote:
>> In my experience, these sorts of errors arise when there really is something
>> wrong with the code, usually involving sizes of integers (e.g. 'long' in
>> struct's definition and 'int' in another, on a 64-bit machine). However, the
>> linker is poorly-equipped to detect such errors unless the resulting objects
>> have different sizes.
>>
>> So, while I wouldn't rule out miscompilation, I would first check for
>> silently conflicting definitions in different compilation units.
>
>Does the linker message gives any hint on where to look?
>
>> BTW, a STC would have been extremely helpful here -- all we can do is
>> speculate without it
>
>Could you give more details. I cannot find on the net what you mean by "a STC".

http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#STC

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -