X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-id:	<4E5EE593.1080009@cygwin.com>
Date:	Wed, 31 Aug 2011 21:53:23 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin package naming?
References:	<4E5EE340 DOT 6010009 AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au>
In-reply-to:	<4E5EE340.6010009@cisra.canon.com.au>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 8/31/2011 9:43 PM, Luke Kendall wrote:
> Can someone with some official Cygwin standing tell me how the Cygwin
> package names correspond with the "official" names of the packages, chosen
> by the package owners? In other words, how are the Cygwin package names
> determined? (My hope is that the "official" name is used, possibly with
> "cygwin" added to it in some form.)

Sorry, I have no badge and gun but perhaps I will do.

> I'm asking because I'm finding Cygwin packages that contain no license
> information, at least in the compiled form (e.g. gawk, libiconv2). So I'm
> thinking that in such cases, I can modify my Cygwin license-finding script
> to look up the package by name on freshmeat and try to find the license from
> there.
>
> But that is pointless if the Cygwin package name may have the same name as a
> freshmeat package, but is in fact some other software.

How about <http://cygwin.com/setup.html>?

Aside: I had to muster all my strength to keep from using the phrase "Use
the source Luke!"  I expect you never tire of that. ;-)


-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -