X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	20110803 snapshot fixes XEmacs subprocess problem
From:	ht AT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Date:	Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:10:57 +0100
Message-ID:	<f5bmxfo3q4u.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.21 (linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Edinburgh-Scanned:	at treacle.ucs.ed.ac.uk with MIMEDefang 2.60, Sophie, Sophos Anti-Virus, Clam AntiVirus
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Attempting to run subprocesses from Cygwin-compiled xemacs under
1.7.9-1 on Win 7 64-bit was failing with

 Process sh background write attempted from control tty (SIGTTOU)

Full details at [1].

This has been fixed by the most recent (20110803) snapshot.  Not sure
which snap actually introduced the fix, but thanks!

ht

[1] http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/issue768
-- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht AT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -