delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_CG,TW_YG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <4E3A3732.7070003@gmail.com> |
Date: | Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:07:46 +0200 |
From: | Marco atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Commands slow in wait_sig. |
References: | <BLU150-W37E84393708DF1AED6DA6EAB3A0 AT phx DOT gbl>,<20110803131828 DOT GA22371 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <BLU150-W47E09E568BA4E10AA38ED6AB3D0 AT phx DOT gbl> |
In-Reply-To: | <BLU150-W47E09E568BA4E10AA38ED6AB3D0@phx.gbl> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 8/4/2011 3:59 AM, texas salsa wrote: > >> Nothing in the above indicates that there is a problem in wait_sig. >> The delta times in an strace do not mean "This is how long an operation >> took". They just indicate the number of microseconds since the last >> update to strace output. >> >> What the above says is: >> >> 1) wait_sig is about to call ReadFile. It has been 9743 microseconds >> since strace last reported anytinng. >> >> 2) There was a lag of 342445 microseconds before something happened in >> main. That could be symptomatic of the problem which the 8/01 snapshot >> works around. Or not. >> >> If it is only happening on one system that obviously points to BLODA. >> >> cgf >> > > > Hi, > > Marco, cgf, Thanks for the reply. > > I don't use bash-completion. > $ cygcheck -cd bash-completion > Cygwin Package Information > Package Version > $ > I do use symantec antivirus which is in the BLODA list. I disabled it and observed a little performance improvement. > > 2 Thu Aug 4 09:41:55 2011 > 1 Thu Aug 4 09:41:56 2011 > 2 Thu Aug 4 09:41:57 2011 > 1 Thu Aug 4 09:41:58 2011 > 2 Thu Aug 4 09:41:59 2011 > 1 Thu Aug 4 09:42:00 2011 > 2 Thu Aug 4 09:42:01 2011 > > > But not dramatically. Other PCs I have also have symantec antivirus and no problem. Also in the problem PC symantec antivirus > had been installed from the beginning and no performance issue was seen before. So I doubt symantec is the main contributor > to the command delay. But since no other systems with the same dll level do no see the problem, I think it is possible there > may be other software that interfares cygwin's work. Is there any good way to find a specific BLODA that is having main effect > to my PC? > > Regards, > Yuta the only real way is to remove the software and check for improvment. Antivirus are bad beasts, in one case I saw the disabled AV worst than the active one. Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |