delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_CG,TW_YG |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <BLU150-W47E09E568BA4E10AA38ED6AB3D0@phx.gbl> |
From: | texas salsa <hottexassalsa AT hotmail DOT com> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: Commands slow in wait_sig. |
Date: | Thu, 4 Aug 2011 10:59:14 +0900 |
In-Reply-To: | <20110803131828.GA22371@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
References: | <BLU150-W37E84393708DF1AED6DA6EAB3A0 AT phx DOT gbl>,<20110803131828 DOT GA22371 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p741xZG1031416 |
> Nothing in the above indicates that there is a problem in wait_sig. > The delta times in an strace do not mean "This is how long an operation > took". They just indicate the number of microseconds since the last > update to strace output. > > What the above says is: > > 1) wait_sig is about to call ReadFile. It has been 9743 microseconds > since strace last reported anytinng. > > 2) There was a lag of 342445 microseconds before something happened in > main. That could be symptomatic of the problem which the 8/01 snapshot > works around. Or not. > > If it is only happening on one system that obviously points to BLODA. > > cgf > Hi, Marco, cgf, Thanks for the reply. I don't use bash-completion. $ cygcheck -cd bash-completion Cygwin Package Information Package Version $ I do use symantec antivirus which is in the BLODA list. I disabled it and observed a little performance improvement. 2 Thu Aug 4 09:41:55 2011 1 Thu Aug 4 09:41:56 2011 2 Thu Aug 4 09:41:57 2011 1 Thu Aug 4 09:41:58 2011 2 Thu Aug 4 09:41:59 2011 1 Thu Aug 4 09:42:00 2011 2 Thu Aug 4 09:42:01 2011 But not dramatically. Other PCs I have also have symantec antivirus and no problem. Also in the problem PC symantec antivirus had been installed from the beginning and no performance issue was seen before. So I doubt symantec is the main contributor to the command delay. But since no other systems with the same dll level do no see the problem, I think it is possible there may be other software that interfares cygwin's work. Is there any good way to find a specific BLODA that is having main effect to my PC? Regards, Yuta -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |