delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2011/08/03/16:43:17

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_SV
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4E39B2C9.3060607@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:42:49 -0700
From: David Rothenberger <daveroth AT acm DOT org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: git-svn hang starting with 20110721 snapshot.
References: <4E383AC9 DOT 4000406 AT acm DOT org> <20110803084427 DOT GA999 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20110803134528 DOT GA27354 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20110803140013 DOT GA27420 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20110803180231 DOT GA481 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4E399617 DOT 7020900 AT acm DOT org> <20110803190314 DOT GB18612 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1312401761 DOT 7008 DOT 17 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> <20110803201952 DOT GC18612 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4E39B056 DOT 6020200 AT acm DOT org>
In-Reply-To: <4E39B056.6020200@acm.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 8/3/2011 1:32 PM, David Rothenberger wrote:
> On 8/3/2011 1:19 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> Other than that I don't have an answer for you.  There's only
>> so much you can do within the 32 bit address space.  That's only one
>> reason why a 64 bit Cygwin would be a good idea.
> 
> What was the motivation for putting the heap and mmaps above 0x80000000?
> Was there not enough space for them below? Would there be enough space
> below if all the DLLs were above?

Rereading this, I realized it sounds a little snotty. I'm not trying to
second guess your decision; I was just curious. Feel free to ignore the
question. :)

-- 
David Rothenberger  ----  daveroth AT acm DOT org

Warning: Listening to WXRT on April Fools' Day is not recommended for
those who are slightly disoriented the first few hours after waking up.
                -- Chicago Reader 4/22/83

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019