delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On 8/3/2011 1:32 PM, David Rothenberger wrote: > On 8/3/2011 1:19 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> Other than that I don't have an answer for you. There's only >> so much you can do within the 32 bit address space. That's only one >> reason why a 64 bit Cygwin would be a good idea. > > What was the motivation for putting the heap and mmaps above 0x80000000? > Was there not enough space for them below? Would there be enough space > below if all the DLLs were above? Rereading this, I realized it sounds a little snotty. I'm not trying to second guess your decision; I was just curious. Feel free to ignore the question. :) -- David Rothenberger ---- daveroth AT acm DOT org Warning: Listening to WXRT on April Fools' Day is not recommended for those who are slightly disoriented the first few hours after waking up. -- Chicago Reader 4/22/83 -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |