X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:00:28 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: git-svn hang starting with 20110721 snapshot.
Message-ID:	<20110803150027.GC24779@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<4E383AC9 DOT 4000406 AT acm DOT org> <20110803084427 DOT GA999 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20110803134528 DOT GA27354 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20110803140013 DOT GA27420 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20110803145605 DOT GA24779 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20110803145605.GA24779@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Aug  3 16:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug  3 10:00, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > Huh.  I ran rebaseall before reporting the above but, on inspecting the
> > output from strace, I saw that dlls were getting located in non-rebased
> > locations.  So, I ran rebaseall again.  *Now* I see the hang.  Weird.
> > 
> > So I guess I can investigate the actual problem now.  FWIW, strace
> > reports that the child of a fork has died with a SIGSEGV but I don't see
> > the location of the SIGSEGV in the strace output.  So it will be a
> > little tricky to track down.
> 
> Is git-svn using perl?  I have constant problems using perl after a 
> rebase.  The problem starts with perl.exe(!) being rebased(!) to
> 0x50000000(!).  However, when rebasing perl.exe to 0x400000 where it

Well, not exactly 0x50000000, but in that region.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -