X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4E33372A.2010009@acm.org>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:41:46 -0700
From:	David Rothenberger <daveroth AT acm DOT org>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 1.7.10s 20110729 - problem listing services in /proc
References:	<4E3302E5 DOT 6000602 AT acm DOT org> <20110729202142 DOT GD13084 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1311979011 DOT 3972 DOT 13 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04>
In-Reply-To:	<1311979011.3972.13.camel@YAAKOV04>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 7/29/2011 3:36 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 22:21 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jul 29 11:58, David Rothenberger wrote:
>>> With the 20110729 snapshot (and some earlier ones), the following
>>> command terminates early.
>>>
>>> % find /proc/registry/HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/SYSTEM/CurrentControlSet/services -maxdepth 1 -print
>>>
>>> strace lists an exception: "exception C0000005 at 6100296A". This is
>>> occurring for me in both Win7 x64 and WinXP x86. It doesn't occur in
>>> either environment using 1.7.9.
>>
>> I can't reproduce this.  Address 6100296A points to a double free on
>> the cygheap, alternativly an overwritten memeory slot on the cygheap.
>> Without being able to duplicate the problem it's rather hard to find.
>> Can you try earlier snapshots to find out in what timeframe this 
>> problem has been introduced?  An strace might be helpful as well.
> 
> I did have C0000005 exceptions with the 20110729 snapshot with seemingly
> all fork() calls, which I don't have with 1.7.9.  I'm running Win7 SP1
> x64 with large-address-aware executables and DLLs rebased above
> 0x80000000.  I won't be able to diagnose this further until after the
> weekend.

For what it's worth, I was also running the 20110729 snapshot on Win7
SP1 x64 with large-address-aware executables and DLLs rebased above
0x80000000, and this was the only regular problem I was seeing.

-- 
David Rothenberger  ----  daveroth AT acm DOT org

File cabinet:
        A four drawer, manually activated trash compactor.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -