X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-id:	<4E330DC6.4070009@cygwin.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:45:10 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Portable shell code between Cygwin and Linux
References:	<80hb65b3ue DOT fsf AT somewhere DOT org>
In-reply-to:	<80hb65b3ue.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 7/29/2011 9:42 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:

<snip>

> Here, I cd first to my config file, as I removed full paths from client.vpn
> config file:

<snip>

> I'm aware of cygpath, but still don't see clearly which are the best trade-off
> to be able to write portable shell code -- if possible. Any hint?

Sounds to me like you're using a Windows version of OpenVPN.  You'd need a
version built for Cygwin to make this transparent.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -