X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_FROM,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf AT spammotel DOT com>
Subject:	Portable shell code between Cygwin and Linux
Date:	Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:42:33 +0200
Lines:	45
Message-ID:	<80hb65b3ue.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Url:	Under construction...
X-Archive:	encrypt
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (windows-nt)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hello,

For every shell code that I write, I'd like it to be portable both to Cygwin
on Windows, and to Ubuntu Linux for example.

It's kinda possible, but am blocked with such a use case:

alias vpnup='exec sudo openvpn --config ~/config/client.vpn --writepid /tmp/openvpn.pid &'

While this worked perfectly under Ubuntu, I've had to make up a customized
version for Windows:

alias vpnupwin='cd c:/home/sva/config; openvpn --config client.vpn --writepid c:/cygwin/tmp/openvpn.pid &'

Here, I cd first to my config file, as I removed full paths from client.vpn
config file:

    ,----
    | ## client.vpn --- client-side OpenVPN config file
    | 
    | # SSL/TLS parms.
    | ca ca.crt
    | cert fni.crt
    | key fni.key
    `----

instead of:

    ,----
    | ## client.vpn --- client-side OpenVPN config file
    | 
    | # SSL/TLS parms.
    | ca /home/sva/config/ca.crt
    | cert /home/sva/config/fni.crt
    | key /home/sva/config/fni.key
    `----

I'm aware of cygpath, but still don't see clearly which are the best trade-off
to be able to write portable shell code -- if possible. Any hint?

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -