X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Sat, 9 Jul 2011 08:58:55 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: pthread_sigmask bug
Message-ID:	<20110709065855.GB29867@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<4E178FD6 DOT 5010101 AT redhat DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4E178FD6.5010101@redhat.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Jul  8 17:16, Eric Blake wrote:
> The current implementation of pthread_sigmask violates POSIX:
> 
> extern "C" int
> pthread_sigmask (int operation, const sigset_t *set, sigset_t *old_set)
> {
>   return handle_sigprocmask (operation, set, old_set, _my_tls.sigmask);
> }
> 
> POSIX requires that sigprocmask returns -1 and sets errno on failure,
> but that pthread_sigmask returns a positive error value on failure (and
> for QoI leaves errno untouched).
> 
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/sigprocmask.html

PTC?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -