X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_RX,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Dieter <d DOT guthmann AT gmx DOT net>
Subject:	vi in rxvt-Session really slow
Date:	Fri, 8 Jul 2011 13:50:32 +0000 (UTC)
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<loom.20110708T152320-804@post.gmane.org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hello,

I've downloaded cygwin including the rxvt-Terminal.
The local terminal with bash works great, but when I connect in a rxvt-Window to
a remote-Server via ssh and run there "vi", the vi-startup needs a few seconds...
When I use the simple Bash-Shell in the Windows-Command-Window then vi is much
faster (it opens the file instantly). Also closing vi by ":q!" needs more time
when using rxvt than simple-bash.

Why is remote vi so slow when I use rxvt? Would that be better if I use xterm
(currently not installed)? 

Additional information:
I had to set 
export TERM=cygwin
in my ~/.bashrc - otherwise the remote host answers 
"unknown terminal type, falling back to 'dumb'"
or
"WARNING: terminal is not fully functional"

Rgds
Dieter


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -