X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	lars AT lamasti DOT net (Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rndal?=)
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Emacs and removal of CYGWIN=tty
References:	<m3y60jrbre DOT fsf AT dalen DOT lamasti DOT net> <4E0C62D6 DOT 3060901 AT cornell DOT edu> <20110630115403 DOT GH4471 AT const DOT bordeaux DOT inria DOT fr> <20110630140836 DOT GG9552 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <m31uy3ga9v DOT fsf AT dalen DOT lamasti DOT net> <20110706071951 DOT GC23717 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <m3iprfeszv DOT fsf AT dalen DOT lamasti DOT net> <20110706085340 DOT GQ1457 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <m3pqlnacph DOT fsf AT dalen DOT lamasti DOT net> <20110706152740 DOT GB29906 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Date:	Thu, 07 Jul 2011 09:31:28 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<20110706152740.GB29906@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> (Christopher Faylor's message of "Wed, 6 Jul 2011 11:27:40 -0400")
Message-ID:	<m3ipremtrj.fsf@dalen.lamasti.net>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Christopher Faylor writes:

> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:08:26PM +0200, Lars Bj?rndal wrote:
>>[Corinna]
>>
>>> On Jul  6 10:03, Lars Bj?rndal wrote:
>>>> [Corinna Vinschen]
>>>> 
>>>> > What I don't get from your reply is if you are comparing the latest
>>>> > snapshot against 1.7.9 with CYGWIN=tty mode, or if you're comparing
>>>> > to another snapshot in default console mode.
>>>> 
>>>> Oh, I'm sorry. Tested against the 1.7.9 version.
>>>
>>> In CYGWIN=tty or CYGWIN=notty mode?
>>
>>In both environments, BRLTTY works with 1.7.9.
>
> So are you claiming that Corinna's change caused the problem or did you
> see this with other snapshots?

I did a test with 20110624, and BRLTTY doesn't work there either. Sorry
for the confusion. Corinnas patch looks perfect.

Let's wait for Samuel to comment, since he is contributing to the BRLTTY
development team.

Lars

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -